[talk-au] Our work in last two weeks

Nemanja Bračko brackone at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 21:23:35 UTC 2019


@Warin,

I personally do not see why is it wrong if you split? It is just two
segments merged in one node. Geometry and data are exactly the same just it
is represented as two, instead of one line.

If we go deeper in this issue, it is actually wrong, because you have
marked/mapped 2 physical segments with just one line. Angle is not natural
for any road. However, it doesn't make any difference in routing so it is
acceptable to be mapped as one line in cases like this.

Thanks,
Nemanja

On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, 21:33 Ben Kelley, <ben.kelley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Personally I think that's a handy warning.
>
>    - Ben
>
>
>
> On Tue., 22 Jan. 2019, 07:25 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On 22/01/19 02:45, Nemanja Bračko wrote:
>>
>> I agree on that, but that's the way how this tool works.
>>
>>
>> So you will have to accept that the tool is wrong and ignore its output.
>>
>> Altering the map to comply with a tool that is wrong is wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-- 

Sent from my phone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20190121/c3c3e45e/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list