[talk-au] Our work in last two weeks

[David Wales]

I don't know what the OSM convention is for this, but I tend to agree with Nemanja. It makes more sense to split the two halves of the road, rather than have them as a single way. 

On 22 January 2019 8:23:35 am AEDT, "Nemanja Bračko" <brackone at gmail.com> wrote:
>@Warin,
>
>I personally do not see why is it wrong if you split? It is just two
>segments merged in one node. Geometry and data are exactly the same
>just it
>is represented as two, instead of one line.
>
>If we go deeper in this issue, it is actually wrong, because you have
>marked/mapped 2 physical segments with just one line. Angle is not
>natural
>for any road. However, it doesn't make any difference in routing so it
>is
>acceptable to be mapped as one line in cases like this.
>
>Thanks,
>Nemanja
>
>On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, 21:33 Ben Kelley, <ben.kelley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Personally I think that's a handy warning.
>>
>>    - Ben
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue., 22 Jan. 2019, 07:25 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/01/19 02:45, Nemanja Bračko wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree on that, but that's the way how this tool works.
>>>
>>>
>>> So you will have to accept that the tool is wrong and ignore its
>output.
>>>
>>> Altering the map to comply with a tool that is wrong is wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>-- 
>
>Sent from my phone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20190122/3fdfbda1/attachment.html>