[talk-au] Undiscussed edits to Australian Tagging Guidelines on tagging footpaths/cycleways (Was: Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law)

Fri Oct 4 06:06:14 UTC 2019

+1.

Do have to amend the bits around not legal for SA cyclists to be on
footpaths given
https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/23438/DPTI-Cycling-and-the-Law-Booklet.pdf

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:31 PM Andrew Davidson <theswavu at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:09 PM Herbert.Remi via Talk-au <
> talk-au at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> There are almost no paths in the ACT compliant with Australian Tagging
>> Guidelines
>>
>
> Thanks for bringing that to our attention. Turns out that a "helpful" wiki
> user radically changed the suggested way to tag footpaths and cycleways
> back in May this year:
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Tagging_Guidelines&type=revision&diff=1849762&oldid=1845590
>
> I propose that we revert the page back to what it said before these edits.
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20191004/4ae925af/attachment.html>