[talk-au] Undiscussed edits to Australian Tagging Guidelines on tagging footpaths/cycleways (Was: Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law)

[Ewen Hill]

Daniel,
   I thought it was 250watts for e-bikes (a European standard now basically
global) so the book may be incorrect anyway

Ewen

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor at gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1.
>
> Do have to amend the bits around not legal for SA cyclists to be on
> footpaths given
> https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/23438/DPTI-Cycling-and-the-Law-Booklet.pdf
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:31 PM Andrew Davidson <theswavu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:09 PM Herbert.Remi via Talk-au <
>> talk-au at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>>> There are almost no paths in the ACT compliant with Australian Tagging
>>> Guidelines
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for bringing that to our attention. Turns out that a "helpful"
>> wiki user radically changed the suggested way to tag footpaths and
>> cycleways back in May this year:
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Tagging_Guidelines&type=revision&diff=1849762&oldid=1845590
>>
>> I propose that we revert the page back to what it said before these edits.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>


-- 
Warm Regards

Ewen Hill
Internet Development Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20191004/d3c5016c/attachment.html>