[talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

[Andrew Harvey]

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 19:09, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>
wrote:

> Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>, wrote:
>
> For these "routes" though there is no clear A to B, there will be short
> segments which are obivously part of a route because there are arrows
> directing cyclists, but sometimes these are just short segments to the next
> intersection so it's unclear where the route goes from and to, hence why
> someone has resorted to just dumping all the segments into one route
> relation.
>
>
> Exactly, so it’s not an A-B “route”, it’s a network, and should be in a
> network relation rather than a route relation.
>

But which network relation should they be part of since they can link in
all sorts of ways it's hard to say which gets grouped together.


> The other alternative is to just put lcn=yes on the way (and indeed that’s
> done in lots of other places). cycle.travel gives a small uplift to ways
> tagged with that.
>

Yep, that's my personal preference where there is no obvious named route.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200425/1424c553/attachment.htm>