[talk-au] Fire Station Operators

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun Jan 5 22:40:31 UTC 2020


Created the wiki page for building=fire_station ... it is a small page 
but there.

On 05/01/20 21:42, David Wales wrote:
> Thanks all,
>
> Changeset:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79209273
>
> On 5/1/20 9:15 pm, Warin wrote:
>> There are some 944 of them in the data base .. so they should be 
>> documented.
>>
>> I'd be pleased to add a few more, along with the suggested tags.
>>
>> On 05/01/20 21:02, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>> Okay with me though it would be good if that tag was documented at 
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
>>>
>>> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 20:15, Sebastian S. <mapping at consebt.de 
>>> <mailto:mapping at consebt.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi,
>>>     Similar to schools the building should be tagged
>>>
>>>     building=fire_station
>>>
>>>     See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fire_station
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 5 January 2020 4:55:26 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey
>>>     <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com <mailto:andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Yes, this is
>>>         https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM_element,
>>>         there should only be one amenity=fire_station for a single
>>>         fire station.
>>>
>>>         Where possible I prefer to trace the site boundary as this
>>>         can be useful information and put all the tags on that, and
>>>         then just have a way inside it with building=yes an none of
>>>         the fire station tags.
>>>
>>>         But I think it's also fine to just have a node, or to just
>>>         have the building without the site as interim solutions or
>>>         for fire stations where the extent is just the building
>>>         which don't have a yard.
>>>
>>>         On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 15:27, David Wales
>>>         <daviewales at disroot.org <mailto:daviewales at disroot.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Somewhat related to this.
>>>
>>>             Camden West Rural Fire Service has both a traced
>>>             building, *and* a traced site border.
>>>             Both are currently tagged with amenity=fire_station.
>>>
>>>             The building has the rest of the identifying tags.
>>>
>>>             I feel that it makes sense to only have one feature
>>>             tagged with amenity=fire_station, and the rest of the
>>>             tags. Should this be the building, or the site border?
>>>
>>>             See link below:
>>>             https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=724460466#map=20/-34.05818/150.67674
>>>
>>>             Regards,
>>>             David Wales
>>>
>>>             On 4/1/20 2:39 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>>>             On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Sebastian Spiess
>>>>             <mapping at consebt.de <mailto:mapping at consebt.de>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Andrew,
>>>>                 I've done one. Just clarifying regarding the branch.
>>>>
>>>>                 branch  =   Narrabeen Fire Station
>>>>                 name   =  Fire and Rescue NSW Station 068 Narrabeen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             I can't see clearly from Mapillary what the singe looks
>>>>             like, but branch should be just "Narrabeen", without
>>>>             the "Fire Station" words. Then you could still have
>>>>             name=Narrabeen Fire Station.
>>>>
>>>>                 Is this how you suggested? Before the branch tag
>>>>                 was the name.
>>>>
>>>>                 I've also added
>>>>                 building =    fire_station
>>>>
>>>>                 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79179815
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200106/0e05eaf0/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list