[talk-au] Fire Station Operators
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun Jan 5 22:40:31 UTC 2020
Created the wiki page for building=fire_station ... it is a small page
but there.
On 05/01/20 21:42, David Wales wrote:
> Thanks all,
>
> Changeset:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79209273
>
> On 5/1/20 9:15 pm, Warin wrote:
>> There are some 944 of them in the data base .. so they should be
>> documented.
>>
>> I'd be pleased to add a few more, along with the suggested tags.
>>
>> On 05/01/20 21:02, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>> Okay with me though it would be good if that tag was documented at
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
>>>
>>> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 20:15, Sebastian S. <mapping at consebt.de
>>> <mailto:mapping at consebt.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Similar to schools the building should be tagged
>>>
>>> building=fire_station
>>>
>>> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fire_station
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 January 2020 4:55:26 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey
>>> <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com <mailto:andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, this is
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM_element,
>>> there should only be one amenity=fire_station for a single
>>> fire station.
>>>
>>> Where possible I prefer to trace the site boundary as this
>>> can be useful information and put all the tags on that, and
>>> then just have a way inside it with building=yes an none of
>>> the fire station tags.
>>>
>>> But I think it's also fine to just have a node, or to just
>>> have the building without the site as interim solutions or
>>> for fire stations where the extent is just the building
>>> which don't have a yard.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 15:27, David Wales
>>> <daviewales at disroot.org <mailto:daviewales at disroot.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Somewhat related to this.
>>>
>>> Camden West Rural Fire Service has both a traced
>>> building, *and* a traced site border.
>>> Both are currently tagged with amenity=fire_station.
>>>
>>> The building has the rest of the identifying tags.
>>>
>>> I feel that it makes sense to only have one feature
>>> tagged with amenity=fire_station, and the rest of the
>>> tags. Should this be the building, or the site border?
>>>
>>> See link below:
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=724460466#map=20/-34.05818/150.67674
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> David Wales
>>>
>>> On 4/1/20 2:39 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Sebastian Spiess
>>>> <mapping at consebt.de <mailto:mapping at consebt.de>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Andrew,
>>>> I've done one. Just clarifying regarding the branch.
>>>>
>>>> branch = Narrabeen Fire Station
>>>> name = Fire and Rescue NSW Station 068 Narrabeen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can't see clearly from Mapillary what the singe looks
>>>> like, but branch should be just "Narrabeen", without
>>>> the "Fire Station" words. Then you could still have
>>>> name=Narrabeen Fire Station.
>>>>
>>>> Is this how you suggested? Before the branch tag
>>>> was the name.
>>>>
>>>> I've also added
>>>> building = fire_station
>>>>
>>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79179815
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200106/0e05eaf0/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list