[talk-au] Fire Station Operators

[David Wales]

Thanks all,

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79209273

On 5/1/20 9:15 pm, Warin wrote:
> There are some 944 of them in the data base .. so they should be
> documented.
>
> I'd be pleased to add a few more, along with the suggested tags.
>
> On 05/01/20 21:02, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>> Okay with me though it would be good if that tag was documented
>> at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
>>
>> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 20:15, Sebastian S. <mapping at consebt.de
>> <mailto:mapping at consebt.de>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>     Similar to schools the building should be tagged
>>
>>     building=fire_station
>>
>>     See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fire_station
>>
>>
>>     On 5 January 2020 4:55:26 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey
>>     <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com <mailto:andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Yes, this
>>         is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM_element,
>>         there should only be one amenity=fire_station for a single
>>         fire station.
>>
>>         Where possible I prefer to trace the site boundary as this
>>         can be useful information and put all the tags on that, and
>>         then just have a way inside it with building=yes an none of
>>         the fire station tags.
>>
>>         But I think it's also fine to just have a node, or to just
>>         have the building without the site as interim solutions or
>>         for fire stations where the extent is just the building which
>>         don't have a yard.
>>
>>         On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 15:27, David Wales
>>         <daviewales at disroot.org <mailto:daviewales at disroot.org>> wrote:
>>
>>             Somewhat related to this.
>>
>>             Camden West Rural Fire Service has both a traced
>>             building, *and* a traced site border.
>>             Both are currently tagged with amenity=fire_station.
>>
>>             The building has the rest of the identifying tags.
>>
>>             I feel that it makes sense to only have one feature
>>             tagged with amenity=fire_station, and the rest of the
>>             tags. Should this be the building, or the site border?
>>
>>             See link below:
>>             https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=724460466#map=20/-34.05818/150.67674
>>
>>             Regards,
>>             David Wales
>>
>>             On 4/1/20 2:39 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>>             On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Sebastian Spiess
>>>             <mapping at consebt.de <mailto:mapping at consebt.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Andrew,
>>>                 I've done one. Just clarifying regarding the branch.
>>>
>>>                 branch  =   Narrabeen Fire Station
>>>                 name   =  Fire and Rescue NSW Station 068 Narrabeen
>>>
>>>
>>>             I can't see clearly from Mapillary what the singe looks
>>>             like, but branch should be just "Narrabeen", without the
>>>             "Fire Station" words. Then you could still have
>>>             name=Narrabeen Fire Station.
>>>              
>>>
>>>                 Is this how you suggested? Before the branch tag was
>>>                 the name.
>>>
>>>                 I've also added
>>>                 building =    fire_station
>>>
>>>                 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79179815
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200105/11375932/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200105/11375932/attachment-0001.sig>