[talk-au] Namespace for maintenance tags

[Andrew Davidson]

On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> 
> 1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference, 
> the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific 
> then ref:psma or something like that would work. No need to invent new 
> tags here when one already exists, is well documented and in widespread use.
> 

I have been pondering this further and I'm wondering if these type of 
maintenance tags would be more appropriate in the note namespace. So:

note:*=*

rather than

ref:*=*

as note=* is for information for other mappers.

Any thoughts/objections/counter proposals?