[talk-au] Namespace for maintenance tags

[Warin]

On 17/9/20 11:40 am, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>
>> 1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a 
>> reference, the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be 
>> more specific then ref:psma or something like that would work. No 
>> need to invent new tags here when one already exists, is well 
>> documented and in widespread use.
>>
>
> I have been pondering this further and I'm wondering if these type of 
> maintenance tags would be more appropriate in the note namespace. So:
>
> note:*=*
>
> rather than
>
> ref:*=*
>
> as note=* is for information for other mappers.
>
> Any thoughts/objections/counter proposals?


notes tend to be alerts for caution?

What about using comment:*=* as these tend to be informative, perhaps 
too casual?