[talk-au] Admin_level discussion for Australia

[Andrew Harvey]

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpostal_code indicates
post code areas should be type=boundary + boundary=postal_code +
postal_code=* on a relation or way. Given we don't have a good open data
set for postal code boundaries, it's hard to map these anyway. They
probably don't need an admin_level at all.

I think the other two we have 6 for LGA and 10 for Suburb/Localities are
well used already and reasonable and what's being proposed for the PSMA
import.

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:34, Ewen Hill <ewen.hill at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you Andrew H for your un-waivering (sic) efforts and changing the
> entire way the Australian map is developing. Chapeau!
>
> Andrew's last message in part, discussed how the admin_levels are defined
> as and prompted for some suggestions, namely level 9 and 10 and if we
> should include electoral boundaries.
>
> I have set up a quick spreadsheet outlining the admin_levels and I think I
> have transcribed Andrew's thoughts on how it may work and added mine.
>
> Feel free to add your preferred layout in the next available col and add a
> comment if you wish.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dzOJoOL6sVLinzqZDcC2wOj-e_2BNz5QFkI-xGnpJXI/edit?usp=sharing
>
> --
> Ewen
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200917/7662e7e6/attachment.htm>