[talk-au] Cycling on Victorian paths

[forster at ozonline.com.au]

Adam

> Spotting these
> and knowing how far back to revert to might be tricky I guess?
> eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47771844/history

Yes. I have never been involved in a reversion so complex and it  
worries me too. I presume they should be reverted in reverse date  
order, ie most recent first. And acting in a timely manner is  
important, before others do edits on the same objects.

Taking your example, the first reversion is important and the  
following two swapping between path and footway make little difference.

Tony