[talk-au] Consistent addr:state format?

[Andrew Harvey]

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 16:53, tabjsina <sinatabrizi at gmail.com> wrote:

> In this case I intend to specifically only update tags that already have
> a state field defined, rather than populating the empty ones. Andrew, do
> you think that adjusting the existing tag values to match the VIC
> majority would go against the coming data import plans you mentioned?
>

That's fine, anyone can still add them manually for new addresses or you
can tidy up existing ones, the discussion only meant that I won't be doing
a bulk addition or upgrade of addr:state as part of the import. Any
existing addr:state tags are ignored as far as the import code goes so no
issue there.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220130/24a47854/attachment.htm>