[talk-au] Changing building levels elevator to description elevator shell
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 10:01:35 UTC 2022
On 24/10/22 17:16, Phil Wyatt wrote:
>
> Many thanks Sigurjon
>
> I don’t suppose you have accessibility data as well? That would be
> great to know as well.
>
> * wheelchair=yes/no – suitable for wheelchairs?
>
They were put in for things like wheelchairs.. so yes they take
wheelchairs, and prams and bicycles
> *
>
>
> * tactile_writing:braille:lg=yes/no?
>
I'll have a look next time .. but I think they have tactile things on
the buttons too..
> *
>
>
> Cheers - Phil
>
> *From:*Sigurjón Gísli Rúnarsson <sjonni11 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, 24 October 2022 3:37 PM
> *To:* Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Phil Wyatt <phil at wyatt-family.com>; OSM Australian Talk List
> <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Changing building levels elevator to
> description elevator shell
>
> Hi Warin,
>
> Apologies for not getting back to you and acting on this.
>
> We will revisit all these locations and update in the coming days.
>
> Below is how we plan to tag the two typical scenarios:
>
> *inside a building *
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900>
>
> highway=elevator
>
The highway=elevator already exists within these ways as a single node.
See example 2 below .. where someone has used it like this.
> building:levels=2
>
That would mean it only is on building level 2.. and it would not go
from another building level.
>
> indoor=room
>
That would mean it is within a larger building...
>
> room=elevator
>
For pedestrian navigation the highway=elevator as a single node and the
connected highway=footway should work..
Indoor mapping is not my thing .. I don't think many here have tried it.
Some examples may help?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/281120247
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350884415 note here the duplication
using https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3566114780 and the node is what
the footways connect to.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3446811813
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/534454027
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4037948794
> *outside building (stand alone) *
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993533793
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993533793>
>
> highway=elevator
>
> building:levels=3
>
> building:yes
>
> description=elevator shell
>
That would mean it only is on building level 3.. and it would not go
to/from another building level.
>
> Please let me know if you are not happy with this approach.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sigurjon
>
> TfNSW
>
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 22:27, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 23/10/22 21:46, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> > Hi Warin,
> >
> > Both of those examples were previously build:part=elevator. Its
> probably
> > worth asking why they changed them to building:levels=elevator.
> That seems
> > to be a more appropriate tagging.
>
>
> building:part should be a 'part' of a building .. not the entire
> building .. they are both tagged with building=yes.
>
> One example
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996164524/history
>
> has no past history .. so no previous key of building:part.
>
>
> I'd have no problem with building=elevator_shell, but they are
> building=yes. I am happy to change that too, if acceptable?
>
> I have been using building=silo with man_made=silo (key building for
> rendering the area .. man_made just does a symbol).
>
>
> >
> > Cheers - Phil
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2022 8:41 PM
> > To: OSM Australian Talk List <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
> > Subject: [talk-au] Changing building levels elevator to
> description elevator
> > shell
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > There are ~260 of closed ways with the tag
> 'building:levels=elevator'.
> >
> > This tag should have numbers as the value not text, the number
> being the
> > number of levels.
> >
> > See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels.
> >
> >
> > These object all are associated with railway stations around
> Sydney and
> > appear to have been added by members of TfNSW team. I have left
> a message on
> > one of their members changeset but have had no reply.
> >
> > There are no other uses of this tag elsewhere in the world.
> >
> >
> > My thoughts are to change the tag to 'description=elevator
> shell' as these
> > look to be the walls around the outside of the moving elevator
> that is
> > presently mapped as a node in these cases.
> >
> >
> > Examples
> >
> > Way 993829900 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900
> >
> > Way 996164524 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996164524
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-au mailing list
> > Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20221024/81a19168/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list