[talk-au] Murray River relation deletion?

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Have spotted a bit of a similar issue here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6168517#map=13/-28.0105/153.4332,
which has a natural river & a few "streams" running through lots of dredged
out canals e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593943553#map=13/-28.0018/153.3810.

Does this really need the relation included?

Thanks

Graeme


On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 07:59, Little Maps <mapslittle at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Warin and Cleary, I’ll remove the lake from the relation and cut
> the relation back to the river banks. I agree, there’s no need to add name
> or other tags to the riverbank (natural=water) tags as these details are
> already on the waterway and the waterway relation. Warin, I’ve never seen a
> lake that has a river name on its boundaries like this, the river details
> are usually on a central waterway, if one has been mapped. Thanks again, Ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20230523/2b222060/attachment.htm>