[talk-au] OSM - NSW NPWS liaison

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Sure thing Tony.

That's one of the questions I've got for him when he gets back.

Thanks

Graeme


On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 16:19, <forster at ozonline.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Graeme
>
> I have been attempting to set up a dialogue between Parks Victoria and
> OSM, so far unsuccessfully. I think its a step forward if NWPS wants
> to liaise with a Liaison Officer. I would give them a Liaison Officer
> and at the same time encourage them into the community. The OSM
> Liaison Officer would explain to NWPS that OSM is a community and
> mentor them into the community.
>
> Graeme, please find out whether their contact person is representing a
> region or all of NWPS. If appropriate, can you give me their contact
> info, either on or off list. I would like to talk to them and see if
> it helps get Parks Victoria to appoint a Liaison Officer.
>
> Tony Forster
> Friends of Lysterfield Park
>
>
> > Thanks everybody for your thoughts.
> >
> > As per Steve's comment, here is probably the easiest contact point due to
> > not needing an account, but we'll see what other suggestions are made?
> >
> > I was wondering if a general OSM-AU / OSM-Oceania e-mail address,
> probably
> > as part of OSGeo, would help with this sort of thing?
> >
> > Anyway, my message back to him for further details came back with an OOO
> > till 21/11 (his query was from a few weeks ago) so we have some time to
> > discuss it!
> >
> > His address also listed him being at Coffs Harbour, so I don't know if
> he's
> > asking on a regional basis onl, or if that may be a main office?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Graeme
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 14:48, Ben Kelley <ben.kelley at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In the context of the tracks, there is always the risk that if you
> delete
> >> something that you don't think should be there, that someone else
> re-maps
> >> it because they see it in the aerial photo. (As we discussed.)
> >>
> >> I guess the best is that we could detail a preferred approach (e.g. in
> >> Australian tagging guidelines). I think it's clear that there are a
> number
> >> of views on this though.
> >>
> >> Then at least if something happens that differs from the preferred
> >> approach, it makes it clearer whether a revert is justified.
> >>
> >>  - Ben.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 14:57, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> DWG have received a
> >>> "*Request for a Liaison Officer*:
> >>> To enhance the accuracy of OpenStreetMap data pertaining to the NSW
> >>> National Parks and Wildlife Service"
> >>>
> >>> This has come up in regard to tracks that they say they have previously
> >>> requested be deleted (I'm contacting them to confirm just which?)
> >>>
> >>> What would be the easiest way for them to contact us with questions
> like
> >>> this - here / Forum / Discord?
> >>>
> >>> Question posed in all three places
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Graeme
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-au mailing list
> >> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20231102/b8f78d38/attachment.htm>