[talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

& for some reason, Andy's reply didn't appear in my email until after I
sent my own saying more or less the same thing?

Thanks

Graeme


On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 08:58, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 23:12, Adam Steer <adam.d.steer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> It's not even controversial that NSW NPWS would remove informal trails
>> from OSM. Heck, I would. I'd also get smart, and start to ask OSM to revoke
>> accounts of repeat trail remappers.
>>
>
> Not disagreeing with you, Adam, but if the track has been completely
> removed from OSM, then there's nothing there to say "Don't map it"! If
> somebody is only looking at imagery, & can see a track going off that way,
> that's not on the map, then they're likely to add it & it will immediately
> reappear as a public track, whereas if it stays mapped as an abandoned
> track with access=no, that won't happen.
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20231009/243c6d5d/attachment.htm>