[talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS
Sebastian Azagra Flores
s.azagra at me.com
Tue Apr 23 07:18:45 UTC 2024
Please don’t use Strava as your reference as to whether access is permitted on a specific way as a lot of people do the wrong thing.
> On 23 Apr 2024, at 4:25 PM, forster at ozonline.com.au wrote:
>
> Quoting Ben Ritter <benjaminaritter at gmail.com>:
>
> ...
>> *Which publications are distributing maps of the areas in question that are
>> encouraging use of paths tagged with `access=no`?* I am interested in
>> collecting any and all examples.
>
> Hi Ben
> Strava seems to be not respecting private.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413772229
> Edited 5 months ago by DM9
>
> It is private but shows the same colour as public use tracks. I expect the private tag is correct because its not national park between Lanes and Ryans Rd and there are no open gates. I expect its private land belonging to Lanes.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list