[talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

[forster at ozonline.com.au]

Hi Sebastian
Thanks for your input but I am not sure what you mean. Can you give a  
bit more detail please?
Tony

> Please don?t use Strava as your reference as to whether access is   
> permitted on a specific way as a lot of people do the wrong thing.
>
>
>
>
>> On 23 Apr 2024, at 4:25?PM, forster at ozonline.com.au wrote:
>>
>> ?Quoting Ben Ritter <benjaminaritter at gmail.com>:
>>
>> ...
>>> *Which publications are distributing maps of the areas in question that are
>>> encouraging use of paths tagged with `access=no`?* I am interested in
>>> collecting any and all examples.
>>
>> Hi Ben
>> Strava seems to be not respecting private.
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413772229
>> Edited 5 months ago by DM9
>>
>> It is private but shows the same colour as public use tracks. I   
>> expect the private tag is correct because its not national park   
>> between Lanes and Ryans Rd and there are no open gates. I expect   
>> its private land belonging to Lanes.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
> _____________________________________________________
> This mail has been virus scanned by Australia On Line
> see http://www.australiaonline.net.au/mailscanning
>