[talk-au] Tagging WebSite Links (like wikipedia, wikidata)

Andrew Hughes ahhughes at gmail.com
Mon Sep 23 20:50:42 UTC 2024


As usual, amazing helpful response Andrew :)

It would preferrably not be stored as a full URL. But I'm unsure how to
establish a convention where a tag is commonly transposed into a url in the
osm public map or id editor when displayed.... nice but not essential to us.

I'm also aware linear referencing might be an option... but will have to
start from square one with OpenLR.

Thanks again!!!

On Mon, 23 Sept 2024, 10:15 am Andrew Harvey, <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> I don't have a strong preference, but in the same way as
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia and
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata only include the page
> identifier (language/title) and the wikidata ID, and not the full URL, I
> would suggest do similar, like ref:nhvr=abc123.
>
> In terms of including an external (eg NHVR) reference on each OSM object,
> I think that's okay so long as the OSM community can also lookup those
> references and ensure they are correct (for the right road/road segment),
> fix them, or add missing ones etc. If you were proposing a tag like
> ref:nhvr=abc123 where abc123 was private/internal to NHVR it becomes more
> problematic as mappers can't verify/fix them.
>
> If your data varies a lot along a road way, I'd consider if it makes more
> sense to skip the reference/link and just publish it in a way that
> references OSM, etc. using OSM NodeIDs, OpenLR strings (for example like
> what Mapbox do with their traffic
> https://docs.mapbox.com/data/traffic/guides/data/).
>
> I'd also see what we can do in terms of adding data directly to OSM. Road
> widths can be mapped
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Width_of_streets, gradient
> could be mapped with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline.
> There's some discussion needed though if we want to mass map this kind of
> data into OSM.
>
> On Mon, 2 Sept 2024 at 17:31, Andrew Hughes <ahhughes at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> At the NHVR, we are collecting a lot of information about the
>> road/transport network that doesn't belong in OSM (just like the info on
>> wikipedia and wikidata) does not either. Typically, these are way's but
>> there are many other examples that are likely to be a reality in time.
>>
>> Given that we only have information relevant certain ways, we would
>> like to tag these specific ways to indicate that we have extra information
>> about them.
>>
>> I am completely open to suggestions at this point, but based on:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
>> or possibly
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url
>>
>> I am thinking that something like...
>>
>> website:nhvr=https://maps.nhvr.gov.au/somethinggoeshere/abc123
>>
>> Could be used to link the way(s) that are relevant to the information we
>> have about them.
>>
>> Please let me know what you think.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20240924/872386da/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list