[talk-au] Tagging WebSite Links (like wikipedia, wikidata)

Andrew Harvey andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 23 00:15:38 UTC 2024


Hi Andrew,

I don't have a strong preference, but in the same way as
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata only include the page
identifier (language/title) and the wikidata ID, and not the full URL, I
would suggest do similar, like ref:nhvr=abc123.

In terms of including an external (eg NHVR) reference on each OSM object, I
think that's okay so long as the OSM community can also lookup those
references and ensure they are correct (for the right road/road segment),
fix them, or add missing ones etc. If you were proposing a tag like
ref:nhvr=abc123 where abc123 was private/internal to NHVR it becomes more
problematic as mappers can't verify/fix them.

If your data varies a lot along a road way, I'd consider if it makes more
sense to skip the reference/link and just publish it in a way that
references OSM, etc. using OSM NodeIDs, OpenLR strings (for example like
what Mapbox do with their traffic
https://docs.mapbox.com/data/traffic/guides/data/).

I'd also see what we can do in terms of adding data directly to OSM. Road
widths can be mapped
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Width_of_streets, gradient
could be mapped with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline.
There's some discussion needed though if we want to mass map this kind of
data into OSM.

On Mon, 2 Sept 2024 at 17:31, Andrew Hughes <ahhughes at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> At the NHVR, we are collecting a lot of information about the
> road/transport network that doesn't belong in OSM (just like the info on
> wikipedia and wikidata) does not either. Typically, these are way's but
> there are many other examples that are likely to be a reality in time.
>
> Given that we only have information relevant certain ways, we would
> like to tag these specific ways to indicate that we have extra information
> about them.
>
> I am completely open to suggestions at this point, but based on:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
> or possibly
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url
>
> I am thinking that something like...
>
> website:nhvr=https://maps.nhvr.gov.au/somethinggoeshere/abc123
>
> Could be used to link the way(s) that are relevant to the information we
> have about them.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20240923/8b38ce3f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list