[OSM-talk-be] More cycle routes...

[Jo]

Ben Laenen schreef:
> Hi all,
>
> The different types of cycle routes were quite well divided between 
> national, regional and local routes so far. Unfortunately, we now may 
> need a fourth category for the so called Itinéraires Cyclables 
> Régionaux or Gewestelijke Fietsroute (ICR-GFR) in Brussels [1] (and 
> maybe something similar in Antwerp if we find out if the routes there 
> are still maintained [2]).
>
> The biggest difference between the ICR-GFR network and the other routes 
> is of course that the latter is only for touristic use.
>
> But now: these extra routes mess up the three-layered tagging system 
> lcn/rcn/ncn, so we need to agree on a way to tag these.
>   
I don't know about this specific problem, but to me there is already a 
level missing.

LF -> ncn
cycle nodes -> rcn
theme routes -> lcn

What about the mushrooms? I don't think they will be going away and they 
are not only a Vlaams-Brabant phenomenon. So I would like to see another 
level for that as well. Now they go under lcn, but that muddies the 
waters a lot. Some theme routes already share roads and it's a hodge 
podge as it is. Combining that with the mushroom's network would become 
really a mess. For the record, at the moment I'm only storing the 
mushrooms themselves as nodes.

Jo