[OSM-talk-be] Knooppuntennetwerken (Regional walking networks)

[Jo]

That doesn't look too complicated, I'll look into it, tomorrow.

Jo

2011/8/2 Gerard Vanderveken <Ghia at ghia.eu>

> **
> As a minimum you require an output file dijleland.gpx  like this example
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
> <gpx xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1"<http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1>creator="OSM Route Manager" version="1.1" xmlns:xsi=
> "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance>xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1
> http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1/gpx.xsd"<http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1/gpx.xsd>
> >
> <!-- All data by OpenStreetMap, licensed under cc-by-sa-2.0 (
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). -->
>     <wpt lat="50.788708" lon="4.5839511">
>       <name>301</name>
>     </wpt>
>     <wpt lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521">
>       <name>302</name>
>     </wpt>
>     <rte>
>         <name>Dijleland 301-302</name>
>         <src>OpenStreetMap.org</src>
>         <type>foot</type>
>         <rtept lat="50.788708" lon="4.5839511" > </rtept>
>         <rtept lat="50.788709" lon="4.5839515" > </rtept>
>         <rtept lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521" > </rtept>
>     </rte>
>     <rte>
>         <name>Dijleland 302-303</name>
>         <src>OpenStreetMap.org</src>
>         <type>foot</type>
>         <rtept lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521" > </rtept>
>         <rtept lat="50.788719" lon="4.5839525" > </rtept>
>         <rtept lat="50.788728" lon="4.5839531" > </rtept>
>     </rte>
> </gpx>
>
> For every node there is a waypoint element wpt with the coordinates and as
> name its ref number
> For every sub relation there is a  route element rte
> It contains route points rtept.
> These rtept are all the nodes of the ways from the subrelation.
> The streets and their nodes  need to be ordered from start to end node (the
> ones with the ref tag)
> Regards,
> Gerard
>
>
> Jo wrote:
>
> Gerard,
>
> If you provide me with a detailed example of what data in the osm file,
> needs to become which information in the gpx, I might try to program this in
> Python. It's possible to add python scripts to JOSM.
>
> Jo (Polyglot)
>
> 2011/8/2 Gerard Vanderveken <Ghia at ghia.eu>
>
>> It is not an obligation to have this 'not yet official' collection
>> relation.
>> I got the idea by looking at some Alp paths, where it was used to link all
>> paths of the network.
>>
>> Everyone can add to the Wiki (registration and login required).
>> But if you feel uncomfortable doing edits in a Wiki , I can do it for you,
>> if you send me the relevant data.
>> The relation has to be created first, so the reference can be put in the
>> Wiki
>>
>> For the creation of this specialised GPX, the exporting functions of OSM
>> are not suitabe.
>> There is some programming or script required to put each sub relation into
>> a route and convert the  nodes to waypoints.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gerard.
>>
>>  network (as far as they exist).
>>>
>>> Should such a collection be created for all other knooppunten networks ?
>>> If so, can someone update the wiki page to reflect this, so I can
>>> properly create and tag that collection for Rivierenland
>>>
>>> I downloaded the gpx file  from Zuid-Dijleland. I was hoping to get the
>>> collection of knooppunten as waypoints.
>>> The result was disappointing (import in Garmin RoadTrip). Too many
>>> routes, even non-existing, waypoints without the number of the knooppunt.
>>>
>>> Is there a better way to retrieve the information as GPX ? I would
>>> already be happy with the knooppunten alone, without the routes between
>>> them.
>>> I've tried exporting them from JOSM, but this also looses the number
>>> (which only exists as rwn_ref).
>>>
>>>
>>> Marc
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing listTalk-be at openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20110802/f9f7c672/attachment.htm>