[OSM-talk-be] Knooppuntennetwerken (Regional walking networks)
Gerard Vanderveken
Ghia at ghia.eu
Wed Aug 3 11:05:49 UTC 2011
Alternative is in stead of a route to use track
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<gpx xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1"
<http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1> creator="OSM Route Manager"
version="1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance>
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1
http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1/gpx.xsd"
<http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1/gpx.xsd>>
<!-- All data by OpenStreetMap, licensed under cc-by-sa-2.0
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). -->
<wpt lat="50.788708" lon="4.5839511">
<name>301</name>
</wpt>
<wpt lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521">
<name>302</name>
</wpt>
<trk>
<name>Dijleland 301-302</name>
<src>OpenStreetMap.org</src>
<type>foot</type>
<trkseg>
<trkpt lat="50.788708" lon="4.5839511" > </trkpt>
<trkpt lat="50.788709" lon="4.5839515" > </trkpt>
</trkseg>
<trkseg>
<trkpt lat="50.788709" lon="4.5839515" > </trkpt>
<trkpt lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521" > </trkpt>
</trkseg>
<trk>
<trk>
<name>Dijleland 302-303</name>
<src>OpenStreetMap.org</src>
<type>foot</type>
<trkseg>
<trkpt lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521" > </trkpt>
<trkpt lat="50.788719" lon="4.5839525" > </trkpt>
<trkpt lat="50.788728" lon="4.5839531" > </trkpt>
</trkseg>
</trk>
</gpx>
Advantage is the track segment trkseg element that matches the ways in
the sub relations.
(and no need to filter out double nodes from start and end of these ways)
Regards,
Gerard.
Jo wrote:
> That doesn't look too complicated, I'll look into it, tomorrow.
>
> Jo
>
> 2011/8/2 Gerard Vanderveken <Ghia at ghia.eu <mailto:Ghia at ghia.eu>>
>
> As a minimum you require an output file dijleland.gpx like this
> example
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
> <gpx xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1"
> <http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1> creator="OSM Route Manager"
> version="1.1"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance>
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1
> http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1/gpx.xsd"
> <http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1/gpx.xsd>>
> <!-- All data by OpenStreetMap, licensed under cc-by-sa-2.0
> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). -->
> <wpt lat="50.788708" lon="4.5839511">
> <name>301</name>
> </wpt>
> <wpt lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521">
> <name>302</name>
> </wpt>
> <rte>
> <name>Dijleland 301-302</name>
> <src>OpenStreetMap.org</src>
> <type>foot</type>
> <rtept lat="50.788708" lon="4.5839511" > </rtept>
> <rtept lat="50.788709" lon="4.5839515" > </rtept>
> <rtept lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521" > </rtept>
> </rte>
> <rte>
> <name>Dijleland 302-303</name>
> <src>OpenStreetMap.org</src>
> <type>foot</type>
> <rtept lat="50.788718" lon="4.5839521" > </rtept>
> <rtept lat="50.788719" lon="4.5839525" > </rtept>
> <rtept lat="50.788728" lon="4.5839531" > </rtept>
> </rte>
> </gpx>
>
> For every node there is a waypoint element wpt with the
> coordinates and as name its ref number
> For every sub relation there is a route element rte
> It contains route points rtept.
> These rtept are all the nodes of the ways from the subrelation.
> The streets and their nodes need to be ordered from start to end
> node (the ones with the ref tag)
> Regards,
> Gerard
>
>
> Jo wrote:
>
>> Gerard,
>>
>> If you provide me with a detailed example of what data in the osm
>> file, needs to become which information in the gpx, I might try
>> to program this in Python. It's possible to add python scripts to
>> JOSM.
>>
>> Jo (Polyglot)
>>
>> 2011/8/2 Gerard Vanderveken <Ghia at ghia.eu <mailto:Ghia at ghia.eu>>
>>
>> It is not an obligation to have this 'not yet official'
>> collection relation.
>> I got the idea by looking at some Alp paths, where it was
>> used to link all paths of the network.
>>
>> Everyone can add to the Wiki (registration and login required).
>> But if you feel uncomfortable doing edits in a Wiki , I can
>> do it for you, if you send me the relevant data.
>> The relation has to be created first, so the reference can be
>> put in the Wiki
>>
>> For the creation of this specialised GPX, the exporting
>> functions of OSM are not suitabe.
>> There is some programming or script required to put each sub
>> relation into a route and convert the nodes to waypoints.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gerard.
>>
>> network (as far as they exist).
>>
>> Should such a collection be created for all other
>> knooppunten networks ?
>> If so, can someone update the wiki page to reflect this,
>> so I can properly create and tag that collection for
>> Rivierenland
>>
>> I downloaded the gpx file from Zuid-Dijleland. I was
>> hoping to get the collection of knooppunten as waypoints.
>> The result was disappointing (import in Garmin RoadTrip).
>> Too many routes, even non-existing, waypoints without the
>> number of the knooppunt.
>>
>> Is there a better way to retrieve the information as GPX
>> ? I would already be happy with the knooppunten alone,
>> without the routes between them.
>> I've tried exporting them from JOSM, but this also looses
>> the number (which only exists as rwn_ref).
>>
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing
>> list Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20110803/5fec3f40/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list