[OSM-talk-be] Streets with two names

[Ben Abelshausen]

>
> Or we could see both examples as different cases and use one tagging
> schema if they are in different cities and the other if they are in the
> same city. After all, these are two different reasons why a street might
> have two names.
>

Very good point, they are different situations.

Anyone else any suggestions?

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Sander Deryckere <sanderd17 at gmail.com>wrote:

> That would work for your case (different names in different
> cities/villages), but it won't work for mine (agreed, it's a very weird
> case).
>
> But I guess you also want a way to note which way is in which city/village.
>
> Maybe mapping the complete street (including all houses with a complete
> set of address tags) is the only solution to achieve this.
>
> Or we could see both examples as different cases and use one tagging
> schema if they are in different cities and the other if they are in the
> same city. After all, these are two different reasons why a street might
> have two names.
>
>
>
> 2011/11/8 Ben Abelshausen <ben.abelshausen at gmail.com>
>
>> that's possible; or something like:
>>
>> name=Ieperleestraat-Neerstraat
>> name:9000=Ieperleestraat
>> name:9800=Neerstraat
>>
>> using the postal codes as distinction?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Sander Deryckere <sanderd17 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not in favour of this. Since the road, at least mine in Ypres, is a
>>> road with just one lane, where you can go where you want. It would be the
>>> same like splitting buildings because there are more than one shop in it,
>>> instead of using POI to note the shops in the building. Splitting ways will
>>> cause weird rendering problems and routing problems. What we need is a
>>> tagging schema to allow double names. Maybe something like
>>>
>>> name=Ieperleestraat-Neerstraat
>>> name:left=Ieperleestraat
>>> name:right=Neerstraat
>>>
>>> Sander
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/11/8 Dennis Bollyn <dennis at gyrbo.be>
>>>
>>>> The cleanest solution is probably to split the way into two, one way
>>>> for each direction and name them separately. This also seems like the only
>>>> way to have a correct "is_in", etc.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Dennis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Sander Deryckere <sanderd17 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> This makes me think of a similar situation in Ypres:
>>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/94237553
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone knows a better solution, please share.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greets,
>>>>> Sander
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/11/8 Ben Abelshausen <ben.abelshausen at gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure how to handle this, maybe it is somewhere on the wiki
>>>>>> already?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have this street (one of many):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/32206997
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On one side the addresses use the streetname *lessensestraat *and
>>>>>> the other side *rekestraat *depending on the commune they are in,
>>>>>> Brakel or Geraardsbergen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there any specific tags for this? Is using name<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=nl>= lessensestraat-rekestraat ok? I guess not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ben
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>>>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20111108/6ec45b96/attachment.htm>