[OSM-talk-be] Regional walking networks

[Marc Gemis]

I use both openwandelkaart and Lonvia to check my edits. Recently, I noticed
that some walking networks are rendered differently in Lonvia. The routes
have a rectangle with 2 characters (ZD - Zuid-Dijleland and KH - Kempische
Heuvelrug). Furthermore some routes have a proper lavel (ZD 100-101) instead
of just the ID of the object.

Rivierenland -
http://hiking.lonvia.de/?zoom=13&lat=51.09385&lon=4.40489&layers=FFBT0
 (also click Routes in lower right corner)
vs
Zuid-Dijleland - http://hiking.lonvia.de/?zoom=13&lat=50.7784&lon=4.60522

Is this the new standard to tag regional walking networks ? Can this be
documented on the wiki ?



Another question is regarding the name of those networks. Apparently, the
name of the brochure  (see http://www.wandelroutes.org/wandelnetwerk.htm )
does not always match the name on the signposts.

E.g. Kempense Heuvelrug (brochure) is Antwerpse Kempen (signposts)
In het land van Stille Waters (brochure) is Scheldeland (signposts)

Which name is preferred ? Should we somehow mention both names ?
Or is e.g. Antwerpse Kempen a superset of the Kempense Heuvelrug ?

thanks in advance

m
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20111010/6910da64/attachment.htm>