[OSM-talk-be] zone30/50/70 vs Bebouwde kom/Agglomération/Built-up area
Jo
winfixit at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 16:33:22 UTC 2012
I got the urban/rural from the tagging or talk mailing list. I have never
seen built-up area as a tag on OSM. I did see city limit, but personally I
always heard city limitS. So even though I am not entirely happy with
urban, it's short and to the point and apparently it's already used
extensively in Germany and to a lesser extent in Finland.
The BE: prefix makes sense, as the rules inside built-up areas differ even
between EU countries.
OK, I see your point. Someboy using a geospatial database can find out
these roads are in Belgium with an (expensive?) query. People who only have
the tags available can't, though.
Jo
2012/11/26 Ben Laenen <benlaenen at gmail.com>
> On Monday 26 November 2012 16:41:41 Jo wrote:
> > I created the following mapcss style to help visualize, alongside the
> > alreayd existing maxspeed style:
>
>
> > > way["zone:traffic"="BE:urban"]::built-up_area
>
> Can't we just use "built-up_area" as a value? Small villages aren't exactly
> "urban", but they still have built-up areas.
>
> Also, why the "BE" prefix, these roads are in Belgium, no need to duplicate
> that information on all the roads.
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20121126/8c2c8c7c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list