[OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

[Daan Bellefroid]

Well, it is wrong. Can it be changed?

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad

Op 14-jun.-2013 om 12:38 heeft Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be> het
volgende geschreven:

 The fact that Rotselaar trickles up into Leuven can be explained according
to the current data:

 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/143580669

Still looking into that search problem..

Glenn

On 06/14/2013 12:17 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote:

Beginners question:

 In Nominatim: the search "Leybos, Werchter" gives no results. The search
"Leybos, Rotselaar" does.

 Is this normal behaviour? Of course Werchter is a sub-administration of
Rotselaar.

 Is it so that boundaries are set as "the bigger one wins"?

 Further, Rotselaar seems to be incorporated into Leuven although the two
have nothing in common.

 Maybe there exists some documentation that clearly explains and I could
read?


_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing
listTalk-be at openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130614/2828ec74/attachment.htm>