[OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries
Daan Bellefroid
daan at idaan.be
Fri Jun 14 11:38:18 UTC 2013
Or maybe because of the "Arrondissement Leuven" (bigger than the city)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2524256
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be> wrote:
> The fact that Rotselaar trickles up into Leuven can be explained
> according to the current data:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/143580669
>
> Still looking into that search problem..
>
> Glenn
>
>
> On 06/14/2013 12:17 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote:
>
> Beginners question:
>
> In Nominatim: the search "Leybos, Werchter" gives no results. The search
> "Leybos, Rotselaar" does.
>
> Is this normal behaviour? Of course Werchter is a sub-administration of
> Rotselaar.
>
> Is it so that boundaries are set as "the bigger one wins"?
>
> Further, Rotselaar seems to be incorporated into Leuven although the two
> have nothing in common.
>
> Maybe there exists some documentation that clearly explains and I could
> read?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing listTalk-be at openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130614/d45ca1e3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list