[OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

[A.Pirard.Papou]

On 2013-05-29 07:39, Marc Gemis wrote :
> Why do they complain about
>
> access = no @ (weight > 3.5) 
>
> ?
>
> I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional
> restrictions. Is there another way ?
>
Remember that, instead of coding all the rules that are in the Wiki,
they prefer to automatically deduce some rules from what the majority of
mappers do.  I wonder if they analyze false positive that way too.
They welcome the remarks very much.
For example, there was a rule (of theirs) saying that the character code
for the keys is, otherwise said, ASCII, which is indeed what the
majority of keys is using.  I pointed out that not only the rule is
UTF-8 but that discussions insist on UTF-8.

Cheers,

André.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130529/330beaa1/attachment.htm>