[OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

[Ben Laenen]

On Wednesday 29 May 2013 07:39:12 Marc Gemis wrote:
> Why do they complain about
> 
> access = no @ (weight > 3.5)
> 
> ?
> 
> I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional restrictions. Is
> there another way ?

Why isn't that one just "maxweight=3.5"? Sure, it's the same, and it shouldn't 
mark it as an error, but the maxweight tag is much easier...

Ben