[OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

[Marc Gemis]

sorry, access = nu is  a bad example

access = delivery @ (weight > 3.5)


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Ben Laenen <benlaenen at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 29 May 2013 07:39:12 Marc Gemis wrote:
> > Why do they complain about
> >
> > access = no @ (weight > 3.5)
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional restrictions.
> Is
> > there another way ?
>
> Why isn't that one just "maxweight=3.5"? Sure, it's the same, and it
> shouldn't
> mark it as an error, but the maxweight tag is much easier...
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130529/a78b3014/attachment.htm>