[OSM-talk-be] Multipolygon relation for landuse (Farmland)?

[Ben Abelshausen]

This relation is also a bit over the top. This is supposed to be 'landuse'
but doesn't make sense.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1067268

I think we should push this kind of thing back to the french border.

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,

Ben Abelshausen

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be> wrote:

>  This can be done without using a relation.  Multipolygons are widely
> used for landuse but this is the first I see as a relation ...
>
> If the relation would have extra meaning to it (e.g. name="De
> trappistenstreek" ) it would have added value but as it stands, this is
> just adding complexity without adding value.  But it's allowed according to
> the wiki.
>
> Glenn
>
>
>
>
> On 26-11-13 10:24, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
>
>  What do you guys think about using multipolygons for landuse?
>
> An example here:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3338083
>
> I don't see the point of having this kind of relation. Maybe I'm missing
> something.
>  Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Best regards,
>
> Ben Abelshausen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing listTalk-be at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20131126/669f52fa/attachment.htm>