[OSM-talk-be] Multipolygon relation for landuse (Farmland)?

[Glenn Plas]

On 26-11-13 12:19, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
> This relation is also a bit over the top. This is supposed to be 
> 'landuse' but doesn't make sense.

a bit ?  That is way over the top imho.  I would expect this to be 
stopped by customs at the border ....  It took OSM a half minute to 
display that map here.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1067268
>
> I think we should push this kind of thing back to the french border.

Totally aggree, especially this:


CLC:code = 211
CLC:id = FR-246825
CLC:year = 2006

that's not even accurate for our side of the border.  omfg.   This 
constitutes a huge amount of work to create this beast, and I wonder why 
one would hurt himself like that..  Now, how to go about removing this 
totally useless relation.

Glenn

>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Best regards,
>
> Ben Abelshausen
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be 
> <mailto:glenn at byte-consult.be>> wrote:
>
>     This can be done without using a relation. Multipolygons are
>     widely used for landuse but this is the first I see as a relation ...
>
>     If the relation would have extra meaning to it (e.g. name="De
>     trappistenstreek" ) it would have added value but as it stands,
>     this is just adding complexity without adding value.  But it's
>     allowed according to the wiki.
>
>     Glenn
>
>
>
>
>     On 26-11-13 10:24, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
>>     What do you guys think about using multipolygons for landuse?
>>     An example here:
>>     http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3338083
>>     I don't see the point of having this kind of relation. Maybe I'm
>>     missing something.
>>     Met vriendelijke groeten,
>>     Best regards,
>>
>>     Ben Abelshausen
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Talk-be mailing list
>>     Talk-be at openstreetmap.org  <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Talk-be mailing list
>     Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20131126/d5712247/attachment.htm>