[OSM-talk-be] CRAB & OSM (again)

[Jo]

I was only planning to do that one street... I would probably have done it
even without the import, as it drew my attention while adding a bus route.

There is some crazy house numbering going on there though. 1 is right next
to 126. a bit further  2, then 124, then 3, then right next to it 120. 123
and 3a are on the other side of the street. Oh and that's on the 'normal'
part of this street, not on its many side branch streets :-)

People must have very stable addresses there, but how do they get their
mail and how do emergency services located them before were GPS systems?

Jo


2013/10/28 Ben Abelshausen <ben.abelshausen at gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I notice that addr:city and addr:country are missing in the AS relation.
>>
>
> This was intentionally. Do we need addr:city there?
>
> My personal opinion: yes, getting this from the boundaries is too
> complicated and will fail often.
>
> Also:
>
> - Don't map too many addresses already :-) It could make things more
> difficult when sending all our findings to the imports list.
> - We really need concensus on the whole building vs node thing. I'm just
> in favor of building because this is just the same conclusion they reached
> at the NY import and they did a LOT of research into the matter.
>
> I'm planning on this being the final iteration. After fixing the latest
> issues with the script and updating the import description page I hope we
> will be able to send things to the imports-list and we can finally start
> using this data in a big way! :-)
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Best regards,
>
> Ben Abelshausen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20131028/c8945b5f/attachment.htm>