[OSM-talk-be] Humbeeksesteenweg tertiary or secondary road ?

[Ben Laenen]

On Monday 10 March 2014 13:57:44 Andre Engels wrote:
> Primary/secondary/tertiary/unclassified distinctions are not absolute for
> Belgium, there is some degree of subjective judgement in that. Having said
> that, N-roads are usually secondary (or primary), so I'd say that one
> should have a good reason to downgrade it to tertiary, lacking that
> secondary seems right.

secondary is usually the minimum for N-roads (except when it's really nothing 
more than unclassified or residential), but tertiary exceptions can happen if 
they make sense.

The problem is that he also made the entire road to Willebroek secondary up to 
the N16 for no real reason. The N211a isn't even one kilometer long and 
doesn't extend further north than Kareelstraat here 
http://osm.org/go/0EodBpd6Q-?m=

Ben