[OSM-talk-be] road axes in pedestrian areas

Matthieu Gaillet mgwebmail at fastmail.fm
Wed Feb 24 06:08:39 UTC 2016


I mapped the pedestrian area in Brussels using areas and the autorouter seems quite happy with them : have a look : http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=50.8472%2C4.3403%3B50.8508%2C4.3524#map=15/50.8500/4.3532

Or did I miss your point ?

Matthieu (sur iMobile)

> Le 18 févr. 2016 à 13:30, Santens Seppe <Seppe.Santens at stad.gent> a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
>  
> Are there any sensitivities I should know of when adding “road” axes in pedestrian areas? My idea is to add to OSM the axes that are in the GRB (Agiv) to aid pedestrian routing. I’ve seen this in some places, in others not (yet?). Is it considered ok to do this? Or would you advice against this because these “virtual axes” cannot be verified in the field?
>  
> Seppe
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160224/a0be384d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-be mailing list