[OSM-talk-be] road axes in pedestrian areas

[joost schouppe]

Mathieu, what you did is what Seppe is suggesting to do in Ghent, if I
understand correctly.

In Brussels you have both areas and lines.  The routing uses the lines. In
Ghent, in a lot of places, the lines were removed.
Op 24-feb.-2016 13:09 schreef "Matthieu Gaillet" <mgwebmail at fastmail.fm>:

> I mapped the pedestrian area in Brussels using areas and the autorouter
> seems quite happy with them : have a look :
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=50.8472%2C4.3403%3B50.8508%2C4.3524#map=15/50.8500/4.3532
>
> Or did I miss your point ?
>
> Matthieu (sur iMobile)
>
> Le 18 févr. 2016 à 13:30, Santens Seppe <Seppe.Santens at stad.gent> a
> écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Are there any sensitivities I should know of when adding “road” axes in
> pedestrian areas? My idea is to add to OSM the axes that are in the GRB
> (Agiv) to aid pedestrian routing. I’ve seen this in some places, in others
> not (yet?). Is it considered ok to do this? Or would you advice against
> this because these “virtual axes” cannot be verified in the field?
>
>
>
> Seppe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160224/e0071c16/attachment.htm>