[OSM-talk-be] Dog parks (was Import of 2000 DAE in Belgium (Defibrillators / Défibrillateurs))

[joost schouppe]

Marc,
I don't know what's going on here. I checked my query, and it does include
relations. In fact, here a relation actually shows up:
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#18/51.18539/4.39963
And here nothing:
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#18/51.15785/4.39513
I don't understand why relation 6302488 would behave any differently from
6265218.

Unrelated: why would you not just tag the closed line itself as a dog park?
(no criticism, just couldn't think of any advantages)

2016-06-10 6:43 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> As an alternative, we could so something like this:
> >>
> http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#16/51.1953/4.3929
> >> This takes the live open data feed for dog parks (places where you are
> >> allowed to unleash your dog) from Stad Antwerpen and shows it together
> with
>
> Joost, do you include relations for the dogparks ? I just added 2 dogs
> parks in this [1] area and the are not show in red.
> I typically draw a closed line for the fence and then make a
> multipolygon for the area. I recently started using this technique
> while I'm working on landuse. I think I saw this method described for
> the first time (for me) by Dieterdreist.
>
> regards
>
> m
>
>
> [1]
> http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#17/51.15664/4.39480
>



-- 
Joost @
Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160610/0503f873/attachment.htm>