[OSM-talk-be] integrated Routeplanner GraphHopper on osm.org strange result

[joost schouppe]

Hi Jakka,

I suppose it is related to this issue:

https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/1215
(that is the correct place to post errors of this kind I think)

I think Graphopper allows this to happen because NOT doing so would be a
bigger error. It often happens that the authority that defines the cycle
route does not communicate with the authority that defines access for
bicylces, and then you get situations where you can't drive into the street
you have to ride into. Example:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202425978#map=18/50.75460/3.72778

I would suggest reclassifying the road to highway=construction +
construction=cycleway. Given the description in the Note, that seems to be
more correct than the current tagging.


-- 
Joost Schouppe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20180801/da871e18/attachment.htm>