[OSM-talk-be] integrated Routeplanner GraphHopper on osm.org strange result
Jakka
vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com
Thu Aug 2 08:06:26 UTC 2018
Tag addapted to highway=construction + construction=cycleway
I follow up the results.
Op 1/08/2018 om 18:12 schreef joost schouppe:
> Hi Jakka,
>
> I suppose it is related to this issue:
>
> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/1215
> (that is the correct place to post errors of this kind I think)
>
> I think Graphopper allows this to happen because NOT doing so would be a
> bigger error. It often happens that the authority that defines the cycle
> route does not communicate with the authority that defines access for
> bicylces, and then you get situations where you can't drive into the
> street you have to ride into. Example:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202425978#map=18/50.75460/3.72778
>
> I would suggest reclassifying the road to highway=construction +
> construction=cycleway. Given the description in the Note, that seems to
> be more correct than the current tagging.
>
>
> --
> Joost Schouppe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list