[OSM-talk-be] integrated Routeplanner GraphHopper on osm.org strange result

[Jakka]

Want the controle other locations of the strange behavior of routeplanner.
What the overpass code for the full access=no without something else 
like foot=yes or bicycle=yes ecetera ?

Op 2/08/2018 om 10:06 schreef Jakka:
> Tag addapted to highway=construction + construction=cycleway
> I follow up the results.
>
> Op 1/08/2018 om 18:12 schreef joost schouppe:
>> Hi Jakka,
>>
>> I suppose it is related to this issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/1215
>> (that is the correct place to post errors of this kind I think)
>>
>> I think Graphopper allows this to happen because NOT doing so would be a
>> bigger error. It often happens that the authority that defines the cycle
>> route does not communicate with the authority that defines access for
>> bicylces, and then you get situations where you can't drive into the
>> street you have to ride into. Example:
>>
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202425978#map=18/50.75460/3.72778
>>
>> I would suggest reclassifying the road to highway=construction +
>> construction=cycleway. Given the description in the Note, that seems to
>> be more correct than the current tagging.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joost Schouppe
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be