[OSM-talk-be] Tagging proposal for cycling highways (Fietssnelwegen)

[s8evq]

Actually, after reading the wiki pages, `cycle_network=BE:cycle_highway` seems indeed the best choice here.

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 19:45:39 +0100 (CET), "s8evq" <s8evqq at runbox.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:35:51 +0100, Pieter Vander Vennet <pietervdvn at posteo.net> wrote:
> 
> > *Tagging scheme*
> > 
> > I'd actually go for `cycle_network=BE:cycle_highway`, as cycle_network
> > normally has a country prefix. Because most (all?) of them are already
> > tagged, we could simply update the tagging all at once.  I'll do that
> > next week, unless a better proposal or good reason not to is raised.
> 
> 
> Concerning the tagging, would perhaps the new tag "network:type" be of any help? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network:type It was invented for the use with value node_network, but could perhaps take other values?
> 
> If we can be critical? What makes a "Fietssnelweg" different from another long distance route like LF5 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5285 Only the operator key?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be