[OSM-talk-be] Tagging proposal for cycling highways (Fietssnelwegen)

[joost schouppe]

Hi Jo,

I think that's the right thing to do, thank you.

What I'm still a bit unclear about: if the route itself is unfinished, but
large sections of them are, then I would think the finished parts do
deserve a "ready for use state". We talked about this briefly before, maybe
someone here has an idea how to split up the route (say F3) in three types
of subrelations :

- usable, ready and waymarked (so similar to any "normal" cycle route)
- usable but not ready or waymarked (here the route is proposed, I'd say)
- unusable (here the ways themselves are proposed)

As stated by Stijn and Eebie, the connections "invented" by Jo don't belong
in OSM. However some of these detours are in fact waymarked. For example,
in the cycle highway Brussel-Halle there is an official detour that will be
in place for two years. I'm not sure if this kind of situation needs to ge
in a fourth type...

Joost

Op di 24 dec. 2019 10:57 schreef Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:

> All the figments of my imagination have been removed. I reviewed the
> remaining ones, and fixed them here and there. Where it's not possible to
> use them today to get from the start till the end, they are marked as
> state=proposed.
>
> Jo
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20191225/10b61b73/attachment.htm>