[OSM-talk-be] Tagging proposal for cycling highways (Fietssnelwegen)

EeBie ebe050 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 26 10:16:33 UTC 2019


I am checking  some cycling highways with status proposed and keep the 
parts that are released as usable (Befietsbaar) in the relation and 
delete the status proposed to make them visible and usable in 
routeplanners.
I experienced that the information on the website Fietssnelwegen.be is 
not 100% correct. There are parts released where no bike access is 
allowed. I leave these parts out and also the parts over unpaved paths 
that are difficult for usual bikes.

Eebie

Op 25/12/19 om 13:14 schreef joost schouppe:
> Hi Jo,
>
> I think that's the right thing to do, thank you.
>
> What I'm still a bit unclear about: if the route itself is unfinished, 
> but large sections of them are, then I would think the finished parts 
> do deserve a "ready for use state". We talked about this briefly 
> before, maybe someone here has an idea how to split up the route (say 
> F3) in three types of subrelations :
>
> - usable, ready and waymarked (so similar to any "normal" cycle route)
> - usable but not ready or waymarked (here the route is proposed, I'd say)
> - unusable (here the ways themselves are proposed)
>
> As stated by Stijn and Eebie, the connections "invented" by Jo don't 
> belong in OSM. However some of these detours are in fact waymarked. 
> For example, in the cycle highway Brussel-Halle there is an official 
> detour that will be in place for two years. I'm not sure if this kind 
> of situation needs to ge in a fourth type...
>
> Joost
>
> Op di 24 dec. 2019 10:57 schreef Jo <winfixit at gmail.com 
> <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>>:
>
>     All the figments of my imagination have been removed. I reviewed
>     the remaining ones, and fixed them here and there. Where it's not
>     possible to use them today to get from the start till the end,
>     they are marked as state=proposed.
>
>     Jo
>     _______________________________________________
>     Talk-be mailing list
>     Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20191226/a459e8e4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-be mailing list