[Talk-ca] FW: Canvec import in Montréal with ? names

[James A. Treacy]

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:24:55PM -0500, Frank Steggink wrote:
> Daniel Bégin wrote:
> > By the way, why using only Geobase while Canvec is identical.  I have the
> > impression the initial decision was based on the impression Geobase was
> > better. Am I right?
> >   
> Others can better answer the question about the impression than I do. If 
> you want to use Canvec, we should make sure that equivalent tags are 
> present too. It would be more difficult to add missing information later.

As this keeps coming up, it would be a good idea if the reasons for
one vs the other are put into the wiki.

-- 
James Treacy
treacy at debian.org