[Talk-ca] Quality of Alberta + Next road import area

[Michel Gilbert]

2009/3/25 James Ewen <ve6srv at gmail.com>

> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:06 PM,  <simon at mungewell.org> wrote:
>
> > Do 'we' have a statergy to fix all the unconnected roads? (other than
> > manually, which would be a huge problem in large cities).
>
> Not that I know of, which is why I am in the process of wiping out the
> data that I manually entered into Sherwood Park, and then redoing the
> import from Geobase. It is easier to fix the Geobase ways than it is
> to try and create GeoBase compatible information from OSM data.


We should put an hold on the import untill we get a concensus on the
approach and take the time to correct the Alberta. I do beleive that the
GeoBase must connect to existing OSM. As Simon mentionned, the correction
may become a huge task if our application does not make the work
automatically. I know Jean-Sébastien work made sure that the import preserve
the integration between existing OSM and GeoBase. Sam argument not to touch
existing osm does not make sense. The main goal of collaborative work is to
improve the final product.

Michel

>
>
> James
> VE6SRV
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>



-- 
Michel Gilbert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20090325/9b5c923f/attachment.html>