[Talk-ca] NL FLOW conversion

[Sam Vekemans]

Hi,
I know that was an old message,

I've uploaded a sample from
http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/nlflow/
NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.0.xml.gz<http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/nlflow/NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.0.xml.gz>
NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.1.xml.gz<http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/nlflow/NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.1.xml.gz>


http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.81935&lon=-66.13426&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/59007447

You can see where the blue arrows are.  I added the tag from
waterway=stream  and in some cases, added oneway=yes

This is the 'linear network flow'  so what it does is show the direction of
the water flow & perhaps the current of the water.
Showing an arrow on the water is great for marriners to use the map, so they
would know the best routing on the water
& canoeists to navigate the waters.  It would also (maybe?) be the center
line of the water area.

Anyway, this data is not going to be available in canvec, & the WMS for it
is available which shows these lines

josm link
http://wms.cits.rncan.gc.ca/cgi/wms_en.cgi?map=/export/wms/mapfiles/rhn/geobase_rhn.map&version=1.1.1&service=WMS&request=Getmap&layer=HYDRO_AGGREGAT&format=image/png&STYLE=default&layers=GEOBASE_RHN_NHN&

So my question is, should this be changed from sub_sea=steam to
waterway=stream (and add oneway=yes) to those that dont have oneway attached
already?  (The name isn't needed, because it is usually on all the
waterbody)

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/59005883


Thanks,
Sam

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Yan Morin <progysm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sam Vekemans ask me to talk about this to be sure the file are ok:
> http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/
>
> Sam ask me for Geobase NL_FLOW in OSM files, so I began with 01.
>
> The rules were (based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GeoBaseNHN2osm
> )
>
> line,NID,,attribution,Natural Resources Canada
> outer,NID,,attribution,Natural Resources Canada
> inner,NID,,attribution,Natural Resources Canada
> line,NID,,source,GeobaseNHN_Import_2009
> outer,NID,,source,GeobaseNHN_Import_2009
> inner,NID,,source,GeobaseNHN_Import_2009
> line,NID,,created_by,geobaseNHN-to-osm
> outer,NID,,created_by,geobaseNHN-to-osm
> inner,NID,,created_by,geobaseNHN-to-osm
> line,NID,,geobase:UUID,-
> outer,NID,,geobase:UUID,-
> inner,NID,,geobase:UUID,-
> line,ACCURACY,,accuracy:meters,-
> outer,ACCURACY,,accuracy:meters,-
> inner,ACCURACY,,accuracy:meters,-
> line,TYPE,1,waterway,stream
> line,TYPE,1,waterway:type,observed
> line,TYPE,2,sub_sea,stream
> line,TYPE,2,sub_sea:type,inferred
> line,TYPE,3,waterway,canal
> line,TYPE,3,waterway:type,constructed
> line,DIRECTION,1,oneway,yes
> line,DIRECTION,2,oneway,-1
> line,NAME_1,,name:1,-
> line,NAME_2,,name:2,-
>
> I've used name:1 instead of name to get the name in OSM, but not display
> it because SLWATER and WATERBODY already have the name. name:1 and
> name:2 can be compared with SLWATER name when you import the data.
>
> Should I continue or fix something before doing 02 to 11?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20100512/adb649ee/attachment.html>