[Talk-ca] Rendering rules and tagging paths and hard shoulders for cycles
john whelan
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 28 18:46:18 BST 2010
I realise there is some differences of opinion on this but I'm looking
for guidance. Locally we seem to have a number of these tagged in
different ways. CANVEC appears to tag some of them as highway=footway
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Paths seems to have a wide range of
acceptable options, including bicycle=designated, bicycle=yes,
access=bicycle etc.
What is recommended for multi-use paths where cycling is permitted but
pedestrians have priority?
highway=path
highway=path
bicycle=yes perhaps?
Do we care that some are used as ski trails in winter? Does this
suggest dec-march ski april-nov cycle?
Ontario is planning to increase paved hard shoulders to promote cycle
safety. Quebec I think already has many of these.
paved_shoulder=yes
shoulder:access:bicycle=yes
Has been recommended, any suggestions on rendering rules?
Thanks John
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list