[Talk-ca] Fwd: Re: CanVec import troubles

[Bégin, Daniel]

Hi,
 
I will have a look as soon as possible and I'll get back to you.
 
Daniel

________________________________

From: Adam Dunn [mailto:dunnadam at gmail.com] 
Sent: September 28, 2010 14:17
To: Bégin, Daniel
Cc: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Fwd: Re: CanVec import troubles


Daniel: in the area that Samuel is working with, there appear to be ways and relations that are missing tags.
I opened 064A01.0.osm, and the extreme south-west corner has a way where the only tag is "source=CanVec 6.0 - NRCan". There are no other tags for this way (water? wood? wetland?). Similar ways exist about 1/3 of the way up the western border. The relation the runs the entire length of the northern border has only the tags {type=multipolygon, source=CanVec}, though it should probably also have the natural=water tag.

Samuel: this doesn't negate the problems importing relations you are experiencing, but will cause you some headaches. Wait for Daniel to respond before continuing to import.

Adam


On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Adam Dunn <dunnadam at gmail.com> wrote:


	Sam: I'll take one of the "water" relations as an example.  <snip>

	Play around with Josm and learn from your mistakes and things will get easier.
	
	Adam
	
	
	On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Samuel <samueldyck at gmail.com> wrote:
	



		-------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: 	Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec import troubles	
Date: 	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:19:49 -0500	
From: 	Samuel <samueldyck at gmail.com> <mailto:samueldyck at gmail.com> 	
To: 	Adam Dunn <dunnadam at gmail.com> <mailto:dunnadam at gmail.com> 	


		Hi
		
		So how would I replace the previously uploaded data with fresh CanVec Data. I can't seem to get rid of the old data without cauing conflicts.
		
		Sam 
		
		On 10-09-25 06:43 PM, Adam Dunn wrote: 

			On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Tyler Gunn <tyler at egunn.com> wrote:
			

				I'm not 100% sure what happened with the Canvec data you uploaded, but it looks like the tags are missing from lot of the ways.  The wooded areas are not showing up because they're not marked natural=wood, and the watered areas are not showing up water because they're not marked natural = water.  
				


			Were these areas originally relations? Remember that to select a relation (including the tags) in Josm, you have to double-click on the relation in the relation list, or select it in the list and click on the dotted square button, or right-click the relation in "Member of" and select the relation. Simply highlighting the way is not sufficient. It sounds like this is what may have happened.
			
			Adam
			





		_______________________________________________
		Talk-ca mailing list
		Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
		http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
		
		



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20100929/d04af9a7/attachment.html>