[Talk-ca] Proposal: Cleanup of NHN ways in BC

Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatrails at gmail.com
Tue Feb 22 13:49:51 GMT 2011


...lol
But it makes the map look pritty :-)
... and on normal maps you do see this..


I could put a request in to wipe all my edits ... sice i was the one
who added it in.


Besides the 'routing restrictings and anti-canoests... is their
another reason people don't like an arrow on rivers?


arrow=yes?


cheers,
sam

On 2/21/11, Kevin Michael Smith <smithkm at draconic.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 23:23 -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
>
>>
>> Existing tagging:
>> Currently there are two types of tagging for waterways that were imported.
>> The first of these is that for smaller waterways
>> accuracy:meters=10
>> attribution=Natural Resources Canada
>> oneway=yes
>> source=GeobaseNHN_Import_2009
>> waterway=stream
>> waterway:type=observed
>
> It seems to me that oneway is not appropriate.  It indicates a legal
> restriction on traffic and AFAIK there is no Canada wide restriction
> that all traffic on all waterways must be in the direction of the flow,
> which this tagging would imply.
>
> --
> Kevin Michael Smith <smithkm at draconic.ca>
>


-- 
Twitter: @Acrosscanada
Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/
http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans
Skype: samvekemans
IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room)
@Acrosscanadatrails



More information about the Talk-ca mailing list